top of page

WRN RED FLAG CAMPAIGNS

Red Flag Campaign: Schools

The red flag is the symbol for our WRN Red Flag campaigns. It signifies a serious SAFEGUARDING risk and a failure to PROTECT women and girls from harm. In this Red Flag campaign the harm is to girls in schools.

 

We call on school providers to make SAFEGUARDING the No.1 priority.

 

We call on school providers to make SAFEGUARDING the No.1 priority when building and refurbishing schools.

 

Toilet provision in schools should be lawful and should not discriminate against girls.

​

Every girl should feel safe at school.

What is going on?

​

Millions of girls go to school every day in England and Wales. Thousands of these girls will not have single-sex toilet provision in their schools. Schools have removed single-sex toilet provision and replaced it with unsuitable toilet provision. Most commonly this is mixed-sex toilets often referred to as ‘gender neutral’ or ‘unisex’. Other types include separate cubicles for boys and girls with communal handwashing, or separate cubicles for boys and girls with segregated handwashing but where the cubicles can be seen from the corridor.

Fountain unisex straightened_permission_Eleanor.jpg

A school in Hampshire that has mixed-sex toilets. It has floor-to-ceiling cubicles, with one side for girls and one side for boys, with shared/communal hand washing. The cubicles are visible from the corridor. These toilets constitute unsuitable toilet provision in schools. They fail to comply with legal requirements of The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 and The School Premises (England) Regulations 2012 and are likely to constitute unlawful discrimination and harassment of girls under the Equality Act 2010.

This is not a new phenomenon. As far back as the year 2000 headteachers said the removal of single-sex toilet provision was necessary to manage poor behaviour and allow ‘passive’ supervision by adults. In response to a school installing mixed-sex toilets, it was reported at the time that the Department for Education and Employment said: “The time is not right for the introduction of unisex toilets in schools” and that  they “violate the regulation that pupils aged over eight must not wash their hands together.” Worryingly Ofsted gave the school’s mixed sex toilets the green light in 2001 after reporting that the school consulted with the pupils to make sure they were happy with the arrangements. Parents' concerns appear to have been dismissed. In 2007 government guidance, Standards, specifications and layouts and dimensions 3: Toilets in schools, was published that promoted a standard architectural design as part of the Partnerships for Schools programme. This mandated the ‘gender neutral’ toilet with the fountain wash basin. Around 2015 single-sex toilet provision started being replaced in schools under the guise of ‘inclusion’.  More recently headteachers have come full circle justifying the removal of single-sex toilet provision to manage their pupil’s poor behaviour.

 

The statutory Regulations (The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 and The School Premises (England) Regulations 2012) on toilet provision appeared straightforward to parents challenging schools on the replacement of single-sex provision with mixed-sex facilities or where the girls' toilets facility had the door removed to allow ‘passive supervision’ meaning it was no longer a room.

 

However, parents who did complain, through official channels, and who quoted the Regulations found themselves reading the most bizarre responses, which neatly demonstrated the misinterpretation of the Regulations that also coincided with the misinterpretation of sex in the Equality Act. 

 

Ellie told us: "I had lengthy email exchanges with the Head where he told me the toilets were single-sex because each pupil used an individual cubicle, this despite him describing the sinks as communal."

 

Another parent Karina said: “I was told that cubicles were rooms so met the conditions of Regulation 4 and that communal handwashing where boys and girls used the same sinks didn’t mean facilities were mixed-sex.” 

 

Jenny recalls:  “My school seemed to think mixed-sex provision was fine as long as it was open to the corridor and the cubicles could be seen from those passing by.” 

 

Nicole described her communication: "The responses I received were incoherent and illogical, admitting 'communal' handwashing but claiming more staff supervision meant privacy wasn't compromised. It would be laughable if it wasn't so serious. It shows this is most likely complete incompetence and utter ignorance - And yet these head teachers/CEO of trusts/council legal teams are receiving decent salaries so should be accountable!” 

 

Schools were gaslighting complainants and abusing the complaints process to dismiss their concerns.

 

To gain clarity on this, a group of parents, instructed a leading equality and human rights barrister for a legal opinion on single-sex provision in schools. WRN is now hosting that free Legal Advice and is running the Red Flag Campaign: Schools to focus on the safety of girls in schools.

What are mixed sex toilets? “Indeed, if an area containing a run of toilet cubicles designated for use by both girls and boys can be described as single-sex, what would mixed-sex toilet facilities look like”.Paragraph 22, Karon Monaghan KC, advice on single-sex toilet provision in schools (01/10/2026)

What are mixed-sex toilets if single-sex toilets include boys and girls?

Legal Advice


WRN is hosting this legal advice as part of the Red Flag Campaign: Schools.​Karon Monaghan KC, advice on single-sex toilet provision in schools (01/10/2026). The advice is free for anyone to use and send to their own school.  

legal advice infographic 6 tiles.png

Legal action

 

Parents may want to bring legal action against a school or local council on behalf of a female pupil who has experienced harm. Two landmark legal victories in Scotland have demonstrated this (West Lothian and Scottish Borders Council).

​

Harms to girls because of mixed-sex toilets

 

Girls are experiencing various forms of harm at school because schools have removed and replaced single-sex toilet provision:

 

🚩 Sexual harassment, assault, and rape

🚩 Period stigma and harassment

🚩 Physical intimidation and abuse

🚩 Medical harms

🚩 Negative impacts on girls from minority communities, religious beliefs

🚩 Educational impacts

🚩 Psychological and emotional distress

 

This harm is daily, it starts fresh every day, several times a day, deeply affecting the dignity, privacy, safety and well being of girls. 

​

Sexual harassment, assault, and rape

 

The majority of peer-on-peer sexual harassment in schools involves boys targeting girls, communal spaces can make female pupils feel deeply unsafe.

​

Mixed-sex toilets heighten the risk of peer-to-peer sexual harassment, violence and rape. Incidents of voyeurism—such as boys peering over or under cubicle partitions or sliding mobile phones into adjacent stalls—create environments where girls feel unsafe.

​

A boy in an Essex school was arrested for raping a girl in mixed-sex toilets he was subsequently charged with seven sex offences at the school. 

​

Period stigma and harassment

 

Mixed-sex toilets and toilets where the cubicles can be seen from the corridor exacerbate period stigma, with documented reports of both boys and teachers monitoring, questioning, or harassing girls about menstruation-related needs, severely compromising their privacy and dignity. Period embarrassment leads to some girls skipping school when they are on their period because they don't want to use unsuitable toilets.

​

Girls have a fear of boys knowing they are on their period. They feel embarrassed unwrapping period products in a toilet due to the noise and the lack of acoustic privacy in unsuitable toilet provision exacerbates this. Girls worry about others noticing how long they have been in the cubicle.

​

Bad behaviour from boys such as banging on doors whilst girls are in the cubicles asking them why they are taking so long and what they are doing, boys emptying the period bins, and using them to flood the toilets and boys ‘playing’ with used period products all horrify, intimidate and embarrass girls.

​

Physical intimidation and abuse

 

The presence of boys in mixed-sex toilets leads to intimidation, including physical disruption like banging on cubicle doors while occupied. It can also lead to physical abuse of girls. A girl was left with a nasty head injury after a boy allegedly 'donkey kicked' a door in the mixed-sex toilets while trying to get into her cubicle to take a picture of her.
 

Medical harms

 

To avoid the anxiety and distress of using mixed-sex facilities, many girls resort to holding urine for the entire school day. There have been reports “confirmed by doctors, that there were girls who were not using the toilet in some schools and getting urinary tract infections because they didn’t want to share their toilets with boys”. In addition to (UTIs) girls are suffering chronic bladder pain. Girls are more likely to get UTIs than boys due to biology.

​

Many girls stop drinking water or other liquids during the day to avoid needing the toilet. This can cause headaches, lethargy, and poor concentration in class due to dehydration.

 

Unhygienic seats in mixed-sex toilets due to boys urinating on them can cause problems for girls when changing period products. There are also reports of boys emptying period bins which is a health hazard.

 

When we feel unwell we often go to a toilet, first aiders are taught to look for people who felt unwell in the toilets because of this reason. Getting trapped behind a floor to ceiling door of a mixed sex cubicle can delay a child being detected and therefore delay them getting medical attention. Children with diabetes, asthma and epilepsy are at increased risk. Some children feel claustrophobic in floor to ceiling cubicles and worry about getting locked in which causes anxiety about using the toilet at school.

​

Negative impacts on girls from minority communities, religious beliefs

 

Unsuitable toilet provision where you can see the cubicle from the corridor negatively impacts girls from a variety of different communities, backgrounds, religions and beliefs such as girls from Muslim and jewish faiths and girls from the Gypsy, Roma and Traveller (GRT) communities. This can lead to discrimination. 

 

Older Muslim girls who may wear head coverings and need to adjust them cannot do this in front of boys. GRT communities have strict sex segregation and chaperoning for teenagers which cannot occur in mixed-sex toilets. Mixed-sex toilets may lead to GRT children being withdrawn from education.

​

Educational impacts

 

The daily stress of navigating mixed-sex spaces infringes upon the well-being of female pupils, creating a barrier to their full comfort and participation in the school environment. 

​

Rather than navigate the anxiety and stress of mixed-sex toilets, some menstruating girls choose to skip school entirely. Missing days every month directly impacts their academic achievement and long-term potential.

​

Dehydration, physical pain from holding urine, and constant anxiety over bathroom trips undermine a pupil’s cognitive performance and ability to focus on lessons.

​

Psychological and emotional distress

 

The psychological and emotional impacts of mixed-sex toilets on girls should not be underestimated. The loss of privacy and dignity inevitably felt in a mixed-sex toilet can cause some girls significant distress and anxiety, but the psychological impact on the other girls is equally important. The girls who seem to accept mixed-sex facilities as normal have been taught that they are not entitled to privacy and dignity. Their ability to assert their boundaries has been deliberately compromised by an ideology that calls boundaries ‘exclusion’ and mixed-sex toilets ‘inclusion’. This leaves them more vulnerable to other abuse, such as in a relationship, as they have learnt to ignore their own need for safety. 

 

For the girls who do feel distressed by mixed-sex facilities, the anxiety at school can be extremely detrimental, and is understandably particularly distressing when girls start their periods. The constant state of high anxiety about it can affect everything, from learning to friendships. Some girls have even reported leaving the school at lunchtime to use single-sex toilets in local shops, which is obviously a safeguarding issue schools should be reacting to. They are often pressured to ignore their instincts and accept that mixed-sex toilets are ‘normal’, which is gaslighting and has the same effect it would in other contexts, making her believe she's in the wrong. 

 

Mixed sex toilets are disrespectful of the boundaries of girls. We teach our children from a young age to understand the differences between males and females and to keep themselves private from the opposite sex. By installing mixed-sex toilets and toilets where the opposite sex can see them from the corridor it normalises the mixing of the sexes in private situations. This is a form of grooming. We know mixed-sex spaces and facilities are dangerous for women and girls. WRN has highlighted this in its Red Flag Campaign: Leisure Centres reports. 

​

Unsuitable types of toilet provision

 

The toilets below are from schools in England and constitute unsuitable toilet provision. They fail to comply with legal requirements in the Regulations and are likely to constitute unlawful discrimination and harassment of girls under the Equality Act 2010.

Girl’s only toilets and hand washing but the cubicles and handwashing are visible from the corridor.

Mixed-sex, cubicles for either sex, with shared hand washing. The cubicles are visible from the corridor.

Girl’s only toilets and hand washing but the cubicles and handwashing are visible from the corridor.

Mixed sex visible corridor permission Jenny.png

Mixed-sex toilets and hand washing and the cubicles are visible from the corridor.

What can you do?

 

Write to your school, address your letter to the person(s) responsible for compliance with regulatory, and statutory requirements, including safeguarding. See our infographic below to help you with this. 

 

You will need to address your letter to different people depending on your school type.  You will not be able to find all the email addresses you need.  Most websites will only supply an Admin/info email address. At the top of your email add all the roles for each organisation you wish your letter to be forwarded to.

 

Your letter is not a complaint, it is a FORMAL NOTICE OF STATUTORY BREACH and likely discrimination and harassment of girls under the Equality Act 2010.

 

State your deadline: Give them a strict, reasonable timeframe (usually 10 working days) to confirm in writing how they intend to rectify the breach and address discrimination and harassment of girls.

Who to write to

You may wish to consult a solicitor to discuss legal action against a school or local council on behalf of a female pupil who has experienced harm from unsuitable toilet provision in her school. Do get in touch with us contact@womensrights.network and join your local WRN group to get involved!

bottom of page